On 01/27/2014 10:48 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:57:10 +0100, hasufell wrote: > >> If it's about performance (in the sense of speed), then paludis >> is worse, because dependency calculation is more complex/complete >> there. > > That makes no sense at all. Paludis is written in a different > language using different algorithms. It's not about the amount of > work it does so much as how efficiently it does it. > >
That's exactly what I was saying. I was talking about speed, not efficiency.
