On Wed, 14 May 2014 10:54:35 +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > No, because each element of the RAID is encrypted separately, so > > btrfs can still use the good one to repair the bad one. If you were > > to create an mdadm array, put dm-crypt on that and then btrfs on > > top, which is more efficient because it encrypts each byte only > > once, then you would lose the check and repair facilities. > > What RAID? I think of a laptop with only one SSD inside. You mean the > duplicated metadata in this case?
Ah right. I've got RAID n the brain because I'm currently resizing the partitions for a ZFS RAID so I can try out btrfs... and it's all your fault for starting this thread and piquing my interest in btrfs again! -- Neil Bothwick Secret hacker rule #11: hackers read manuals.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
