On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:59:07 AM Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > Howdy, > > Just wanted to make sure I read the change logs shown below correctly. > So far, I've been using sys-power/upower. Attempting to update > sys-power/upower seems to require sys-apps/systemd to be pulled in as a > dependency, which I don't want to do. > > If I understand the change log below correctly, I should uninstall > sys-power/upower and install sys-power/upower-pm-utils instead. Is that > right? Thanks. > > equery c sys-power/upower-pm-utils > *upower-pm-utils-0.9.23 (26 May 2014) > > 26 May 2014; Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> > +upower-pm-utils-0.9.23.ebuild, > +files/upower-pm-utils-0.9.23-clamp_percentage_for_overfull_batt.patch, > +files/upower-pm-utils-0.9.23-create-dir-runtime.patch, > +files/upower-pm-utils-0.9.23-fix-segfault.patch: > Initial commit of upower 0.9 git branch for use with sys-power/pm-utils > because upower master git branch removed support for it. > Right now this is a copy of =sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r2 without > USE="systemd" because sys-apps/systemd users will be moving to > > >=sys-power/upower-0.99. > > equery c sys-power/upower|sed -n '1,/instead/p' > *upower-0.9.23-r3 (02 Jun 2014) > > 02 Jun 2014; Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> > +upower-0.9.23-r3.ebuild: > Leave 0.9.23-r3 with --disable-deprecated for sys-apps/systemd users. > Users who want UPower with sys-power/pm-utils support will want to emerge > > >=sys-power/upower-pm-utils-0.9.23 instead.
Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone now. A proper solution would have been to have the upower ebuild select systemd as a dependency ONLY when the systemd useflag is set. And depend on upower-pm-utils when it is not set. -- Joost
