On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Kai Krakow <hurikha...@gmail.com> wrote: > And while we are at it, I'd also like to mention bcache. Tho, conversion is > not straight forward. However, I'm going to try that soon for my spinning > rust btrfs.
I contemplated that, but I'd really like to see btrfs support something more native. Bcache is way too low-level for me and strikes me as inefficient as a result. Plus, since it sits UNDER btrfs you'd probably lose all the fancy volume management features. ZFS has ssd caching as part of the actual filesystem, and that seems MUCH cleaner. Rich
