It looks like your MAKEOPTS that you set before the command isn't respected; I see 'make -j8' all through the build log, resulting in make trying to run something that's still being built.
Regardless of whether or not this has been a problem in the past, can you try setting MAKEOPTS in make.conf to either "" or "-j1"? Also, I saw a warning that you had an incompatible version of autoconf, which may (who really knows?) cause the parallel build failure. Hope this helps, Alec On 07/23/2014 09:47 AM, Sid S wrote: > Message delivery has been failing, sorry if this is received twice. > > >Wow, running Steam on Hardened. Seems ambitious. > > Most things work after grsec is clubbed over the head (sadly the only > real option in a lot of cases). > > >1. Reply with a list of actions/commands you did that led up to this > point > > I untared a file extracted from the Valve-provided .deb to /. I then > created the package set and emerged > it; it failed while compiling glibc. Something during these steps > apparently broke glibc/gcc > (with a different error than I am asking about now), so I had to > reinstall them from > http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org and copy a bunch of headers from the > 64 bit directory to a 32 bit one. > Now I'm getting this error. > > I think part of it goes back to when I initially extracted the > Valve-provided .tar.gz... It seems to have > overwritten a lot of files, but I assumed and have been told this is > not the default behavior, or even > really possible (it would have had to clear pre-existing directories). > > >Do you mean I tried to install @steam and it failed once it got to > glibc, or were you running with --keep-going and figured it out in > hindsight? > > It failed immediately, I did not use --keep-going. > > >Did you do a deep update before doing all of this? > > Yes. > > >2. Attach the full build log > > It's too long to include in the message body. What is the best way to > send it? If you do not mind visiting an external link, here is one: > http://bpaste.net/show/488606/. > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel > <a...@alectenharmsel.com <mailto:a...@alectenharmsel.com>> wrote: > > Wow, running Steam on Hardened. Seems ambitious. > > I'll try and help as much as possible. Can you: > > 1. Reply with a list of actions/commands you did that led up to this > point > 2. Attach the full build log > > Also > > > They originally got rebuilt (and I noticed the failure) > > Do you mean I tried to install @steam and it failed once it got to > glibc, or were you running with --keep-going and figured it out in > hindsight? > > Did you do a deep update before doing all of this? > > I've only been running Gentoo for a couple of years, so sorry for > asking all these questions. Most of the time a build fails on my > machine it's because I've done something really, really stupid, so > just > don't want to make the mistake of diving in way too deep and then > figuring out it was a simple issue. > > Alec > > On Tue 22 Jul 2014 12:15:08 PM EDT, Sid S wrote: > > >Are you in the process of switching to hardened right now? Why > are you > > rebuilding glibc and gcc? > > > > No, I set up my system as hardened. They originally got rebuilt > (and I > > noticed the failure) when I set up a package set for running some > > games (using the steam client) and rebuilt the package set. They are > > the packages listed here: http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Steam. > > > > >The file you sent would have been half the size, if you'll > excuse me > > nagging, if you'd sent it in plaintext, rather than HTML. > > > > Did something strange happen? I figured the code blocks would > just be > > surrounded by > > styling tags. Sorry about that. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Stroller > > <strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk > <mailto:strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> > > <mailto:strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk > <mailto:strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>>> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 22 July 2014, at 2:48 pm, Sid S <r03...@gmail.com > <mailto:r03...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:r03...@gmail.com <mailto:r03...@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > ... > > > The build log is kind of large, tell me if the whole thing is > > needed. > > > > The file you sent would have been half the size, if you'll > excuse > > me nagging, if you'd sent it in plaintext, rather than HTML. > > > > Stroller. > > > > > > > >
