On 6 October 2014 23:47:51 CEST, Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Monday 06 Oct 2014 16:44:57 Jens Reinemuth wrote: >> Am Sonntag, 5. Oktober 2014, 18:59:31 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: >> > Am 05.10.2014 um 18:27 schrieb Alan McKinnon: >> > > On 05/10/2014 17:50, Michael Palimaka wrote:ystem all that much. >> > > >> > > My real beef is with akonadi and kdepim. I could never get the >damn >> > > thing to actually work or to tell me what it was doing in a >manner I >> > > could understand. The last straw was around KDE-4.4 when the >importer >> > > managed to destroy my entire mail store and leave me with >nothing, so I >> > > switched to claws and several years later switched again to >> > > Thunderbird. >> > >> > or even better: akonadi eating 10 years and 100 000+ archived >emails. >> > But the gains were there - search became slower, if it worked at >all and >> > all filters broke - several times. >> >> I can't really count how many times i simply deleted all the >> .config/akonadi and .local/akonadi stuff - and let akonadi regenerate >it, >> simply because i deeply believed in the whole crap getting better! It >> never got better... >> >> Currently i can live with all that stuff, simply by disabling all >nepomuk- >> and akonadi-stuff and waiting for it to show all my mails again... >> >> Funny: My wife has a second account with exactly the same settings >and is >> deeply annoyed by the permanent popups telling her that the >balloo-indexer >> has closed... Indeed she has disabled it!!! So i have to kill that >shit >> every time! >> >> Most annoying story in the last time: KdePIM 4.10 simply stopped >working >> with my private Courier-IMAP-Server, telling everyone, that courier >has a >> bug... Ok, maybe, but it worked since every Version and just stopped >> because one ore more developers simply decided to do things >"right"!!! >> >> No Problem in Gentoo, simply mask and downgrade kdepim-meta... I had >more >> problems at work with Kubuntu! With KDE4.10.1 everything works as >> expected... >> >> But this is just a gnome-like-behavior... The developers simply don't >> really care what the users want or need... i really never heard of >anybody >> saying: Oh that search stuff is cool! I use it regularily! >> >> And to go deeper: Why don't they store documents in a database, that >is >> better optimized for documents... MongoDB? CouchDB? Instead they use >this >> shitty mixture of MySQL and Virtuoso!? WTF? > > >No, no, no! What they should do is use Microsoft's Sharepoint server >solution, which stores documents in the MS SQL as binary blobs ... >millions of >corporate users can't be wrong! O_o
Please don't tell them! At one of my customers they use Sharepoint as a CVS for sourcecode.... I keep having to merge changes manually.... -- Joost -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
