you might check out webrsync fwiw

On 11/26/14 23:43, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <li...@xunil.at> wrote:
>> Sometimes I wonder why syncing portage isn't yet available via git ;-)
>>
> Well, right now it is because it is too much of a pain to try to keep
> cvs and git in sync.
>
> However, the plan for the future is to have a master repo (where the
> pushes go to), a git sync repo, and an rsync repo.  The middle option
> is likely going to interest you.
>
> --
> Rich
>


Reply via email to