you might check out webrsync fwiw On 11/26/14 23:43, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <li...@xunil.at> wrote: >> Sometimes I wonder why syncing portage isn't yet available via git ;-) >> > Well, right now it is because it is too much of a pain to try to keep > cvs and git in sync. > > However, the plan for the future is to have a master repo (where the > pushes go to), a git sync repo, and an rsync repo. The middle option > is likely going to interest you. > > -- > Rich >
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future directtion ? hasufell
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future directtion ? Rich Freeman
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future directtion... hasufell
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future directtion... konsolebox
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future direct... Rich Freeman
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future direct... Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future direct... Rich Freeman
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future direct... Paige Thompson
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future direct... Rich Freeman
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future direct... Paige Thompson
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future direct... Rich Freeman
- Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo's future direct... hasufell
- [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future direct... Martin Vaeth
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future di... hasufell
- [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future direct... Martin Vaeth
- [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future direct... Nicolas Sebrecht
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future di... Alan Mackenzie
- Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's future di... konsolebox