On Saturday 27 December 2014 09:57:09 Mick wrote: > On Saturday 27 Dec 2014 09:43:47 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > No doubt this is just as silly an idea as building KMail without its > > database, which also has caused considerable grief. > > Peter, I can't advise on the Activities question, but can you please tell > me how you managed to build Kmail without its database? Is it fully > functional?
I didn't realise I was being ambiguous - sorry. As far as I know, it's impossible to build KMail without its database. It's called progress. ;-) -- Rgds Peter.
