On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:10:46 -0700, Joseph wrote: > >Portage is excessively verbose in it's output. With -v it dumps all > >sorts of info to the console and it's incredibly hard to read. > > > >It especially likes to print the full reasoning why it doesn't upgrade > >some package to latest due to a dependency requirement, and it's this > >that usually hides actual real problems in amongst all the noise. > > > >The level of verbosity from portage over the past year really should > >only be shown with -vvv
> Thank for the hint, never thought about it. I'll try next time "emerge > -uDNavvvq world Alan was saying that portage is already very verbose, you are better off running with no -v options. That way you only see true errors and serious warnings and not all the irrelevant stuff that just gets in the way. > Yes, it was very hard to read and duped information > into the screen that wasn't relevant. Exactly, cut down on the irrelevant information by not using -v. -- Neil Bothwick Sisko:"I won't be condescending to you this episode, Dr. Bashir."
pgp9vesflnv2Y.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
