Rumen Yotov wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 14:29:17 -0300 > Jos__ Pablo Ezequiel Fern__ndez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:21, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: >> >>>no, but I noticed, that reiserfs needs much less space with small >>>files (like portage tree) than ext2/3. >> >>Any numbers you can post ? > > Hi, > Some time ago there was such 'subject' with some data to confirm it. > Now: "#du -h --exclude=packages --exclude=distfiles /var/portage/" > Result=434M. This is on reiserfs-3.6 with tail packing ON. > Note: my portage directory is in /var not /usr > Rumen
confirmed: reiserfs = 434M ext3 = 516M having reiserfs = 100M : 100 -- 118.89 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
