Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> [16-03-30 17:12]: > On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 06:36:15 +0100, Mick wrote: > > > Also worth mentioning is dcfldd which unlike dd can show progress of > > the bit stream and also produce hashes of the transferred output. It > > has the same performance as the dd command though. > > I can't find the reference right now, but I did read that dcfldd > determines the best block size on the fly if none is given. It's > certainly faster than dd when copying images to USB frives (my main use > for it) when given no block size. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > > There is absolutely no substitute for a genuine lack of preparation.
Sounds it will be the tool of choice for that purpose, Neil ! :) Best regards, Meino
