I've always thought it was something like data/disk duplication

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016, 22:46 <meino.cra...@gmx.de> wrote:

> Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> [16-03-31 04:04]:
> > On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:35:33 +0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >
> > >  By the way:  For what stands the 'dd' for ?
> > >  (Think unix!)
> >
> > The apocryphal story is that it is copy and convert, but cc was already
> > taken by the C compiler.
> >
> > If you have ever mistyped the of argument, you'll understand why some say
> > it stands for delete and destroy ;-)
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dd_(Unix) is quite useful.
> >
>
> I had to ask for that.... :)
> I know that story from the "The heritage UNIX society" (THUS ) and
> I found that SO unixy...it put a BIG smile on my face.
>
> But "delete and destroy" is also VERY descriptive... ! ::::)))))
>
>
>
> >
> > --
> > Neil Bothwick
> >
> > Top Oxymorons Number 11: Terribly pleased
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to