On Tuesday 12 July 2016, Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote: > 2016-07-09 8:52 GMT-05:00 Robin Atwood <ro...@binro.org>: > > Attempting to update/world this weekend I get: > > > > > > > > > > > > # emerge -uDv @world > > > > > > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > > > > > > > Calculating dependencies... done! > > > > > > > > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "kde-apps/kdebase-runtime-meta:5" have > > been masked. > > > > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your > > request: > > > > - kde-apps/kdebase-runtime-meta-16.04.2::gentoo (masked by: package.mask, > > ~amd64 keyword) > > > > - kde-apps/kdebase-runtime-meta-15.12.3::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) > > > > > > > > (dependency required by "kde-base/kdebase-startkde-4.11.22-r1::gentoo" > > [ebuild]) > > > > (dependency required by "@selected" [set]) > > > > (dependency required by "@world" [argument]) > > > > > > > > I have all of KDE:5 masked since I think installing it sounds too risky. > > Checking the kdebase-startkde-4.11.22-r1 ebuild it has a dependency on > > kde-apps/kdebase-runtime-meta:5. Is this a mistake? Has anyone found a > > solution to this? > > Robin, > > My ugly hack on this to keep on kde4 withouth pulling frameworks 5: > > 1) use a local overlay > 2) locate kactivitymanagerd-4.13.3-r1.ebuild (in > /var/db/pkg/kde-plasma/kactivitymanagerd-4.13.3-r1) > 3) put the kactivitymanagerd-4.13.3-r1.ebuild into > /usr/local/portage/kde-plasma/kactivitymanagerd/ > 4) add a > SLOT="5" > line to the ebuild > 5) add a unmask line > =kde-plasma/kactivitymanagerd-4.13.3-r1 > to /etc/package.unmask > > I need 5) because I mask all kde-plasma/* packages
Andrés- That did the trick! Thanks very much. Until the next time... :( Cheers Robin -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Robin Atwood. "Ship me somewheres east of Suez, where the best is like the worst, Where there ain't no Ten Commandments an' a man can raise a thirst" from "Mandalay" by Rudyard Kipling ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.