Am Sat, 04 Mar 2017 08:02:11 +0000
schrieb "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org>:

> On March 4, 2017 12:41:05 AM GMT+01:00, Grant Edwards
> <grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 2017-03-03, J. Roeleveld <jo...@antarean.org> wrote:
> >  
> >> On March 3, 2017 7:49:27 PM GMT+01:00, Grant Edwards  
> ><grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  
>  [...]  
> >and  
>  [...]  
> >
> >[...]
> >  
> >> My guess would be some timeout setting on the server killing the
> >> login.  
> >
> >That doesn't seem to be the problem.  I've asked around, and others
> >aren't seeing this problem.
> >
> >I've also noticed that sometimes the mounts will start working again
> >without a umount/mount, but I can't figure out what causes it...
> >
> >Normally, when things are working but idle, the TCP connection to 445
> >shows an SMB echo request/rseponse transaction once per minute.  When
> >it fails, the TCP connection evidently got dropped, and the Windows
> >machine repeatedly shuts down new ones:
> >
> >The failure mode looks like this in wireshark:
> >
> >  Gentoo                            Windows
> >  
> >          ->         SYN          ->  445  
> >         <-        SYN/ACK       <-   445  
> >          ->         ACK          ->  445
> >          ->     SMB[echo req]    ->  445  
> >         <-          RST         <-   445
> >
> >[that repeats 800 times per second for long periods of time]
> >
> >Then at some point, it starts to work:
> >  
> >          ->        SYN          ->  445  
> >         <-       SYN/ACK       <-   445  
> >          ->        ACK          ->  445
> >          -> SMB[proto neg req]  ->  445  
> >         <-  SMB[proto neg rsp] <-   445  
> >          -> SMB[ses setup req]  ->  445  
> >         <-  SMB[ses setup rsp] <-   445
> >                     ...
> > 
> >Sometimes the umount times out and "fails" because the "host is
> >down", and when that happens, it seems like it immediately starts to
> >work again. :/  
> 
> Are other hosts linux or windows?
> 
> Maybe a dodgy switch forgetting the correct path?

Or an MTU problem... Is there a router in the path?

-- 
Regards,
Kai

Replies to list-only preferred.


Reply via email to