On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:16:21 -0400, Robin wrote: > > But when you > > have a lot of packages in package.keywords, you're best of switching > > to a full testing system, IMO.
> That is a pretty bold statement. A lot of packages are masked just > because they are "untested" on a particular architecture, and > sometimes you need that package to run what ever you are running. True, for a few packages. But when you reach the point where you are frequently solving issues by editing package.keywords it is, IMO, time to switch to a more consistent setup. > It is almost like saying: "You like Nachos, so you should only eat > Mexican food" If you find yourself eating nachos for breakfast, lunch and dinner; maybe you should - although I hate to think what wold emerge fro your system when eating that much chilli :) -- Neil Bothwick If you like this tagline, call 1-800-TAGS'R'US
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
