On Saturday 01 April 2006 23:47, Jim wrote: > On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 22:29 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/db/pkg $ epm -qf `which xmkmf ` > > imake-1.0.1-r1 > > > > Please file a bug against tightvnc, as it's missing > > a dependency. > > Will do. > > > BTW: Why use tightvnc at all? Realvnc 4 is as fast in > > my experience and there's still somebody workign on it - > > seeing that the last update to tightvnc is dated > > July 2005, I doubt that anybody maintains it anymore. > > I am testing out the different vnc versions along with freeNX to see > what will give me the fastest remote desktop. > > > Alexander Skwar > > Jim > -- > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > I'm a geek, but I don't get it. 36-24-36 = -24. What's the significance? > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Florida, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way When you're done testing please report/publish the results, I'm also very interested in a fast remote desktop system.
Tightvnc can hog the cpu with the compression sometimes so that's not always a good solution either. -- Rick van Hattem Rick.van.Hattem(at)Fawo.nl
pgphHqsmtu3JQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
