On Sat, 27 May 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:54:44 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > > and KDE continued to > > > work. > > > > Not here. > > I've had a few strange errors since posting that. Like one from Konqueror > when trying to load a page, which then loaded perfectly on the next try. > > > > Maybe i've not run one of the affected programs. > > > > > Re-emerging > > > *everything* to fix a KDE problem seems like knee-jerk overkill. > > > > Well, but that's what's suggested. > > I think I'll pass on that one. Rebuilding all of KDE will take long > enough, but it seems prudent, I'm certainly not going to spend 16+ hours > rebuilding OOo if I don't need to. > > > Anyway, it's plain wrong that NOTHING has to be done after upgrading > > to gcc 4.1.1. Maybe an "emerge -e world" is required. And an "emerge > > -e world" is *very* *much* from doing nothing... > > Absolutely. The GWN posting was clearly optimistic :( > > Why would an emerge -e world be required? It is not required to rebuild every package using the new gcc. They will slowly be rebuilt when they are upgraded. I have done nothing since upgrading and had not one issue. Why would I, it doesn't even make sense? They are binaries, after all. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
