Shaochun Wang schrieb: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:59:53AM +0200, Marc Blumentritt wrote: >> As fas as I understand it, this messages means, that the start of >> net.eth0 is backgrounding, because it can take some ticks. The next >> init-prozess is starting immediately afterward, before net.eth0 is up. >> If a init-process is started, before net.eth0 is up (in your case sshd), >> than it will go in the background, too, and waits, until net.eth0 is up >> and then it will start. Going in the background and waiting generates >> the "schedule" message. >> >> Since I put this stuff together on my own, I do not know, if it is >> correct. Can anyone confirm this? >> >> Cheers >> Marc >> >> -- >> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > I think you are right, but how to disable the anonying message? >
Hmm, i do not think, that this should be disabled. It tells you: "Well, I started sshd, but it will only run, when net.eth0 comes up!" So if sshd does not start, you know there is a problem with net.eth0 and not sshd. Or so I hope... At first I was irritated, too, but now I just do not care. For me, this message is as good as "service foo has been started..." Cheers Marc -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
