On Saturday 02 December 2006 19:22, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 12/2/06, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The next step which I'm afraid of is upgrading
> > to glibc-2.5
> >
> > Having destroyed (the system) of my machine some years
> > ago by upgrading glibc (on Suse), I know that this
> > is not a trivial step.
>
> Actually the glibc-2.4 to 2.5 upgrade is pretty trivial, *if* you
> already have nptl/nptlonly USE flags set.  If you are using a i386
> CHOST (vs i686 or x86_64), then you end up having to change CHOST
> before you can upgrade since glibc-2.5 is nptlonly, and that is not
> trivial unfortunately.  See the current thread on this list.
>
> > So, the question:
> >
> > Is there a general source of information about
> > warnings, actions to be taking, etc  to be followed
> > when upgrading certains critical packages.
>
> Generally speaking, if you set in make.conf:
>
> PORTAGE_ELOG_CLASSES="warn error log"
> PORTAGE_ELOG_SYSTEM="save"
>
> then any ebuilds that want to warn you or give you actions to take
> will create files in /var/log/portage/elog/ for you to read.  You can
> just delete these once you've taken whatever action is required.
>
> More complicated upgrades (like the switch to modular-X, or gcc
> upgrades) usually have some kind of guide created before they reach
> stable.  But at this point, there isn't any single-page reference for
> these guides...probably something we should have.

Also, the GWN gives a heads up on substantial system component upgrades and 
links to upgrade guides, which is fine as long as you are not running ~ARCH 
and bleeding edge version packages.

-- 
Regards,
Mick

Attachment: pgpV8QVJeoRCs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to