on 02/26/2007 01:22 AM Mick wrote the following:
> On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:45, Agg wrote:
>> on 02/26/2007 12:27 AM Willie Wong wrote the following:
>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked:
>>>> You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still
>>>> *off-topic*.
>>> Oh, come on, why can't you have the decency to spam^H post off-topic
>>> from just one e-mail account? It is annoying to have to kill-file
>>> multiple ones.
>> If you had the decency to accept off-topic as off-topic, spam as spam,
>> simple as simple, and hypocrisy as hypocrisy...
>
> You seem to be evidently void of any sense of relevance and proportionality.
Speak for yourself: made a thread out of something *you* call spam. (1)
> This is a 'gentoo-user' mailing list intended to serve the needs of
> gentoo-users; specific support and discussion needs which are relevant to the
> Gentoo meta-distribution. Had you been around for any length of time you
> would have observed the fact that "off-topic" on this list is invariably
> still relevant to IT, computers, Linux and related topics.
>
> After many people told you that your topic is considered irrelevant spam for
> this list and that you are consuming unnecessary bandwidth, you continue to
> annoy with your persistence to spam.
You are. I 'm replying.
> Exhibiting a messianic zeal for a good
> cause in this inappropriate way, has ended up causing a disservice to an
> otherwise laudable cause.
(1)
> Your ends do not justify your means and in this
> case label you as fanatic idiot - because you have no sense of relevance,
> proportionality and respect for your audience.
(1)
>
> Couldn't you just find a *suitable* ML to raise your issue
They should be aware of it.
> and leave us alone?
You don't have to reply to something *you* want to call spam.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
