The reason I asked is that I have been running this on my AMDX2 systems since it has been available with no noticeable degradation, and possibly a little better responsiveness. I thought maybe you had some experience with it that would contradict my experiences.
I always assumed that the "If unsure say no/yes" in the kernel was related to being unfamiliar with the hardware you where configuring the kernel for. That said, all I can really say is that it works for me. -Zac On 8/10/07, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Freitag, 10. August 2007, Florian Philipp wrote: > > Am Freitag 10 August 2007 16:57 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > > On Freitag, 10. August 2007, Zac wrote: > > > > Why don't you want mulit-core scheduler support? > > > > > > read the help text. > > > > CONFIG_SCHED_MC: > > Multi-core scheduler support improves the CPU scheduler's decision making > > when dealing with multi-core CPU chips at a cost of slightly increased > > overhead in some places. If unsure say N here. > > so you have an option that improves the decisions, but penalize you with more > overhead > Who guarantees you, that the cost is not higher than the improvements? > > + 'if unsure say N here'. > > > > > > "multi-core CPU chip" sounds like an appropriate description for AMD X2 > > processors. Are you sure you don't mean SMT or NUMA? > > no. > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
