Never had a problem with LVM. On a mythTV box with LVM, started with 80GB IDE, then added in a 300Gb IDE, then a few months later another 300mb, sata this time. Basicly transparent to Myth
I have avoided LVM on laptops before now because its extra complexity and I'll never add multiple disks. But, on a sony laptop without LVM - I have discovered that when I partitioned it in a rush ~18 months ago, I made the diagnostic partition 5 GBytes instead of 5 mbytes - and now I need the space. My options are to format it and symlink it into the tree, wipe and start again or image, repartition and restore. All have big disadvantages because this is my primary, work, not owned by me laptop (!). It would have been so much easier if I had used LVM ... On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 07:01 -0400, Philip Webb wrote: > Does anyone have advice based on experience using LVM ? > I sb partitioning a new 320 GB hard drive soon for a simple desktop box. > That is 8 times the size of the HDD in my present machine, > which I haven't exhausted by any means. LVM seems more professional > & allows flexibility for unforeseen storage needs, > but it adds a layer of complexity & potential problems arising therefrom. > I wonder whether LVM slows down disk access > & whether there's a disaster lurking unseen if anything goes wrong with LVM: > a bad package update, a damaged config file or file storing LVM's layout > would seem to risk losing everything on the HDD & require re-installation. > > -- > ========================,,============================================ > SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies > TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto -- William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home in Perth! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
