On 29 Mar 2008, at 20:39, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Stroller <stroller <at> stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes:
I, too, thought about saying something like this at the time. I'm
glad you have done so and I agree with all your points.
I don't. I disagree with his most important point...
Yes, but you're demonstrating yourself to be a clueless idiot.
Alan's reply was harmless. You're not entitled to pick on him unless
you posted correctly in the first place.
So, I *am* entitled. Thanks!
No, you're not.
You're asking for help - provide as much information as possible and
please don't antagonise people (especially because they may be able
to help you!).
Now, please go back and read Alans first post in the thread. It
absolutely did not sound, as if he even wanted to help.
That doesn't matter. Please don't antagonise people, full-stop.
I, too, know what it's like to receive a reply to one of my questions
which I find to be unhelpful and aggravating. However, "two wrongs
don't make a right" and no-one benefits from an angry response.
Oh, so it's now my fault for responding to a flamebait? Nice. It's
not the aggressor who's doing something wrong?
It was NOT flamebait. It was HARMLESS.
Grown up!
Stroller.
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
