On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > On Donnerstag, 17. April 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 17:23 +0200 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > > > > fsck runs with the -p option. -p for prune. But xfs does not now the > > > > -p option > > > > > > Just set fsck to 0 in fstab for xfs volumes. > > > > no, the thing is, -p for 'automatic check&repair' is just wrong. -a would > > be better. Because -a is understood by a lot more fscks. > > > > -p as prune/automatic repair is only understood by ext2/3 and reiserfsck. > > -a is there for a reason. A good one. > > Both of them have no effect on fsck.xfs, because no matter what options > you give to a dummy, it will stay a dummy. > > Bye... > > Dirk
yeah, xfs is double fucked ;) but there are more fs than xfs, reiser(fs/4) and ext2/3. If you look into man fsck you find -a but not -p. So no matter what, -a is wrong and patching the tools instead of just replacing a letter is IMHO stupid&dangerous. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
