On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 20:08:43 +0200
Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Am Freitag, 4. Juli 2008 schrieb Florian Philipp:
> > On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 18:35:58 +0200
> >
> > Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Friday 04 July 2008, Florian Philipp wrote:
> > > > I've just set the umask 0007 in /etc/profile. With the rule that
> > > > every user has his own primary group (as it is default), this is
> > > > sufficient for my needs.
> > >
> > > Hmmm. That gives permissions:
> > >
> > > rw-rw----
> > >
> > > on every single new file created by every single user by default.
> > >
> > > If you are happy with that, so be it. I would not be happy with
> > > that :-)
> >
> > Since every user has another primary group this doesn't cause
> > problems. Only on folders with SETGID where the group is changed by
> > design this umask causes other users to have write and read
> > permissions and that's what I wanted in the first place.
> 
> And what about the packages you install/update as root? I'd bet that
> not all give the exact permissions when calling "install".
> 
> Bad idea.
> 
> Bye...
> 
>       Dirk

Hmm, good point. I will monitor the situation.
If there are any occurrences of wrong permissions, I think it will be
sufficient to make an if-clause before setting the umask but maybe it
proves unneccessary.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to