> They claimed that the official build system was not legal but they replaced > it with a build system that definitely is not legal because it is not > included in the source.
Of course the files needed to build cdrkit are in the source (CMakeLists.txt). Does any program that uses autotools come with the complete build system? Where does the GPL say that the buildsystem has to be included in the distributed source package? cdrkit uses cmake to build and that's available under a 3-clause BSD license which is said to be GPL compatible. Could you please explain why you think that the cdrkit+buildsystem is illegal? With references, please. - Sascha
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
