On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 05:38:26PM +0200, Geralt wrote: >> Although it would be possible to include this respawning into slim >> (and I suppose that gdm and kdm have this feature?) it is much more >> work than checking in xdm is slim is still up and if not restarting it >> (since xdm is slim's parent process it gets even informed about it, so >> no polling would be necessary!). > > xdm isn't slim's parent process, slim is a replacement for xdm. Or do > you mean the xdm init script? I meant the xdm init script, since I thought we were talking all the time about the xdm init script when saying xdm. Did I misunderstand something in the previous posts?
Geralt.
