On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:14:26 +0100 Daniel Pielmeier <daniel.pielme...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Michael Higgins schrieb am 11.12.2008 20:54: > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:39:34 +0100 > > Daniel Pielmeier <daniel.pielme...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> and why do you blame Gentoo in > >> bug #250632? > > > > Because I don't know how to find out where the problem comes from. > > They at BGO say it is in overlay, resolved the bug "invalid". Fine > > with me. [8<] > > Well the bug was resolved as invalid as the ebuild is from an overlay > (although Gentoo developers contribute to that one) and that are not > supported. > > I think you just expressed yourself in the wrong way and you did not > provide all the necessary information in your report. > > When looking at the MRO-Compat perl script it says need 5.006. So I > think perl-5.10 is really an unnecessary high dependency. Um, exactly. ;-) The first sign of trouble. Being given via sync an ebuild which blocked updating my system with a *requirement* for 5.10.0 was the first sign of major ebuild problem... And, yes, it was fixed in response to my bug report after all. > > And as you may have seen that bug has been reopened (comment 4) after > my comment and your issue is now resolved (comment 5) by removing this > dependency. And, the person *actually responsible* for the wider error regarding suddenly masked packages (where they weren't "marched" before) emailed me *privately* with explanation. So, one fix via BGO, and one piece of private information for me to quiet my mind. All good! Cheers, -- |\ /| | | ~ ~ | \/ | |---| `|` ? | |ichael | |iggins \^ / michael.higgins[at]evolone[dot]org
