It looks like fixing the /etc/make.profile symlink fixed my problem.
I'm still a little nervous about whether I need to run any other commands in 
order to prevent my system going wrong after making this correction.

Jeff


On Sunday 14 December 2008 09:48:47 pm Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> Progress:
>
> I've discovered that athlon64 is a valid gcc make flag, so I changed it
> back.
>
> I've also discovered that the /etc/make.profile symlink was pointing at the
> x86 default-linux profile set, not the amd64 profile.
>
> I'm attempting a recompile now with the symlink changed, and hopefully this
> will fix my problems.  I wonder if this latent error is not about to cost
> me a whole bunch more though.  Is there anything I should do with the
> emerge command or any other command in order to correct this profile
> problem?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jeff
>
> On Sunday 14 December 2008 09:17:22 pm Jeff Cranmer wrote:
> > Thanks,
> >
> > That only adds more questions.
> > My environment is amd64.  It appears to have downloaded the i586 binary.
> > Surely this is incorrect?
> >
> > my make.conf file contains the line
> > CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=athlon-xp", which should trigger the 64 bit
> > binaries to be downloaded and acted upon.
> >
> > The CFLAGS variable was previously set to "-O2 -pipe -march=athlon64",
> > and I don't think that athlon64 is a valid gcc compile flag, but the
> > response was the same with this set of CFLAGS variables too.
> >
> > Also,since I changed the CFLAGS variable, is there anything I need to do
> > in compilation to correct any errors resulting from the original (I
> > believe invalid) variable?
> >
> > Any suggestions gratefully received.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > On Saturday 13 December 2008 06:43:24 pm Jean-Baptiste Mestelan wrote:
> > > 2008/12/13 Jeff Cranmer <jcranme...@earthlink.net>
> > >
> > > > Perhaps it would have done if I knew where the download page was.
> > >
> > > The file /usr/portage/dev-java/sun-jdk/sun-jdk-1.6.0.11.ebuild
> > > will disclose this information, and hints at
> > > https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/developer.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards.

Reply via email to