Am Samstag, 20. Dezember 2008 20:45:27 schrieb Joerg Schilling: > Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinri...@online.de> wrote: > > Am Samstag, 20. Dezember 2008 18:44:53 schrieb Joerg Schilling: > > > "cp" neither has a "-a" nor a "-x" option. Are you talking abut "gcp"? > > > > Sure he is. This is a Linux mailing list. We don't care which options are > > missing in Solaris' version of cp ;-) > > I was not talking about the Solaris cp but about "cp", the way it is in the > standard.
Just compared the man pages of cp of the three major Unix vendors (SunOS, HP-
UX, AIX). They're all different. If there is a standard, it's not implemented
very well accross different platforms.
> The problem with giving unspecific advise based on non-standard behavior is
> that people may later use the same command line on other platforms and
> fail......
Well, the only cp that can be installed on all of the above platforms is gcp
ok, granted BSD cp would be another option, but I doubt that there are
packages available for all those platforms), so if you want consistent
behaviour, install GNU cp (and its friends). That's what I do at work, where I
have to cope with a heterogenous environment consisting of HP-UX, Linux, SunOS
and Windows. Only by using the GNU variants of the Unix tools I can use our
self-written (shell) scripts on either platform.
So the question is: What's better, following an (eventually minimalistic)
standard or defining the standard yourself?
OTOH, a Linux-only user wont even care. He has gcp, that's his "standard".
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
