On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:55:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

> Perhaps engineering should name the profile updates sequentially then.
> Start with "1" and increment every time something happens that warrants
> a new profile. As it is, the date-based numbering scheme leads people
> to believe there is some kind of mythical "regular release'.

That's a good point. Profiles used to be named like that, then the need
to put dates on CD releases was perceived. Now the CDs are far less
important, maybe we should go back to normal versioning for the profiles.

The name for the current profile does indicate that it is not.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

"Apple I" (c) Copyright 1767, Sir Isaac Newton.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to