On Thursday 29 October 2009 16:59:24 James wrote: > Stroller <stroller <at> stellar.eclipse.co.uk> writes: > > I think that alternative methods of approaching system administration > > are sure to bring their own problems and require an investment of time > > to implement, but I don't see how upgrading machines one by one is > > sustainable. Honestly, it would be driving me crazy to be in your > > position, and I think some other alternative might well show time and > > hassle saved once it's up and running. > > OK guys. > Thanks for the unecessary tongue lashing. > The systems rarely are at my location. I just cannot upgrade them > at my decision, as they belong to others. >
Ah. That explains a lot. You can ignore my other mail of 10 minutes ago about updating multiple machines simultaneously. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
