On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 08:45, Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> daid kahl wrote:
>>>>> I tried closely comparing the current working kernel with newly built
>>>>> one. I mean side by side with `make menuconfig' running in both sources.
>>>>> I cannot tell what it is I'm overlooking.
>>>>>
>>>> Please do not do this.  Instead emerge kccmp to compare kernel
>>>> configurations!  It is much easier...trust me, I tried brute-force as
>>>> well!
>>>>
>>> Thanks for the tip... that tool does look useful.  At least for
>>> kernel comparison I think it might beat the poop out of the ediff mode
>>> in emacs.   Although the emacs tools are better in general.
>>>
>>> I managed to get the kernel figured out... (with plenty of help here)
>>> but I think I'll tinker with kccmp, see how it works, and be ready for
>>> next time.
>>>
>>
>> It's really easy.  You just run it with two configuration files as
>> inputs, and it gives a nice X display with different settings, and
>> then settings that are only in one config or the other (resulting from
>> different kernel versions or sub-config options).
>>
>>
>>> Answering a dozen or so questions on the cmdline beats the poop out of
>>> flopping around in menuconfig, or even worse, 2 instances of
>>> menuconfig.
>>>
>>> What is really maddening is that I once knew how to do the stuff with
>>> .config and `make oldconfig'.   Here lately I seem to forget things I
>>> once knew if I don't use the knowledge for a mnth or two.
>>>
>>>
>> I always do it from the command line with a web-browser searching
>> http://cateee.net/ for any config I don't know what it is.
>>
>> ~daid
>>
>>
>>
>
> Sounds like he may as well use that genkernel thingy that Gentoo has.
> It never has worked for me but he may have better luck.  It may even
> work on the first try.  LOL

I've been using genkernel for 4+ years, of course had some problema
along the way, nothing that couldn't be handle.

I find it really easy to use.

Yeah, it worked first time, some tweaking later and BANG! It was perfect!
-- 
Daniel da Veiga

Reply via email to