Quoth Christel Dahlskjaer (on Thursday, the 14th of September):
At this point I only wish to comment on one particular bit,
I am quite disappointed that you are having a meeting to discuss your
roles when the task agreed at our meeting was that you would all
individually write down what you wished to see yourself doing.
It is not exclusively about the role.
There is also the fact that at the previous two meetings many of us were
missing.
It looks like with this new meeting almost all of us we will manage to
make it, which is a big improvement as we will be able to finalize
the points discussed at the other meetings.
Also a sign that things really are starting to roll now.
We originally left the role fairly fluid so that you could help
influence it, and what we asked for was that you all write down your
personal views and send them to us before our next meeting together
where we will look at the roles and how your ideas go with what we
already have.
Thanks for cc'ing. And I'll comment on the rest when I have a monent.
As most (all?) of the replies didn't reach the ML I'll post a quick
summary of the replies I've received so far through the alias, as most
were more or less in the same spirit:
0) Do we have a leader?
Not needed. We're a team, conflictng opinions are good, definitive
leader decisions not needed.
1) How do we handle URs which go MIA or are slackers?
Most are fine with the 60 day period, but that we should be flexible
with this and make longer leaves possible if required.
2) When and how are new userreps assigned?
This is pretty much already decided by userrel, of which I wasn't aware.
Elections once per year, that's it.
Vacancies most likely filled with "losers" of the last vote, or not at
all if next vote is too close and workload permits it.
3) Suspension (vacation) of URs
Goes together with point 1, wishes for flexibility were voiced, and not
too much interest in too much beaurocracy.
Greets,
Peter
--
Gentoo is like IKEA -- only stable
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
