dear Rufus, thankyou. On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Rufus Pollock wrote: > Great work Jo. I've now taken a look at the letter and made some changes > -- all of style and none of substance. My one remaining suggestion is > that we might want to cut the (now) penultimate paragraph regarding > rejection. The letter is already pretty long and while I have nothing > against the point it takes us off in yet another direction, moreover it > doesn't seem to be something of immediate relevance compared to > determining what position they will take on am 21 and 27. > > Other than that I think this is ready to go.
Okay, +1 on this. Benjamin, what are your plans re. getting copies of a letter to Ministers? I guess we learned with the MEPs that a paper letter works better than anything and in this case of asking questions one has an external record of 'receipt'. Does this mean sending a letter to each national ministry or do they also all have mailboxes in Brussels for their behaviour as the Council? jo _______________________________________________ geo-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/geo-discuss
