Jo Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060818]: > dear Rufus, thankyou. > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:34:45PM +0100, Rufus Pollock wrote: > > Great work Jo. I've now taken a look at the letter and made some changes > > -- all of style and none of substance. My one remaining suggestion is > > that we might want to cut the (now) penultimate paragraph regarding > > rejection. The letter is already pretty long and while I have nothing > > against the point it takes us off in yet another direction, moreover it > > doesn't seem to be something of immediate relevance compared to > > determining what position they will take on am 21 and 27. > > > > Other than that I think this is ready to go. > > Okay, +1 on this. Benjamin, what are your plans re. getting copies of > a letter to Ministers? I guess we learned with the MEPs that a paper > letter works better than anything and in this case of asking questions > one has an external record of 'receipt'. Does this mean sending a > letter to each national ministry or do they also all have mailboxes in > Brussels for their behaviour as the Council?
Yes, of course, we can duplicate our letters to the Coreper, the permanent representatives in Brussels. I can try to compile the adresses of Coreper. Rufus, is the letter ok for you? http://publicgeodata.org/Open_Letter_Third_Reading?action=recall&rev=4 [RP: this para could be cut] <--- What would you cut in there? Or the whole paragraph maybe? -- Benjamin Henrion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 _______________________________________________ geo-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/geo-discuss
