I had the same result when I used 3.4.2, 3.5.2 and the master version. That's why I thought the problem was in data. We run nominatim in container environment, so we are using this configuration (without any changes) - https://github.com/mediagis/nominatim-docker/tree/master/3.5 You can find local.php file here - https://github.com/mediagis/nominatim-docker/blob/master/3.5/local.php That postgres and postgis packages are installed (in Dockerfile) - postgresql-server-dev-12 postgresql-12-postgis-3 postgresql-contrib postgresql-12-postgis-3-scripts \
I've pulled docker image based on nominatim master version that we are using now to Docker Hub registry - https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/bartoliniii/nominatim Tu run import we run the following sequence of commands: apt-get -y update -qq apt-get install -y wget wget -q https://www.nominatim.org/data/wikipedia_article.sql.bin -O /app/src/data/wikipedia_article.sql.bin wget -q https://www.nominatim.org/data/wikipedia_redirect.sql.bin -O /app/src/data/wikipedia_redirect.sql.bin rm -rf /data/nominatim/postgresdata_updated2 && chmod u+x /app/init.sh /app/init.sh /data-osm/osm-pbf/poland-latest.osm.pbf nominatim/postgresdata 12 śr., 28 paź 2020 o 15:50 Sarah Hoffmann <[email protected]> napisał(a): > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 02:51:43PM +0100, Bartosz Kwapisz wrote: > > > You cannot expect the same results for your installation > > > as on the nominatim.openstreetmap website. The OSM server runs > > > always the latest version of Nominatim together with continuous > > > data update. That means that the data you see is indexed with > > > the Nominatim version that was current at the time it was last > > > touched. > > > > > Yes of course, but I tried to use different data sources of pbf files and > > the result is still the same. > > Is there any way to use exactly the same data source (pbf) as is used by > an > > official site? > > Do you know what data is used by official nominatim? > > You are using exactly the same data. It's all OSM. That is not the issue > here. > The problem is that the data was imported in a slightly different way > (partially via updates) and with many different versions of the software. > There is absolutely no way that you can create an installation that > has exactly the same state as nominatim.openstreetmap.org. > > > > Yes I have 'Słowik' in the database with the same osm_id. > > As I mentioned before - there are more villages with the same problem. > > That's why I assume that there has to be a configuration/data source > > problem. > > > > Here is a link to Słownik entry - > > > https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=31879464&class=place > > And local one - > https://nazwa.takeanddrive.eu/tmp/nominatim_local_slowik.png > > I've just downloaded today's Geofabrik extract of Lodz and imported it > into Nominatim using 3.5.2 and the latest master version and I get for > both: > > "Kręta, Słowik, gmina Zgierz, Zgierz County, Łódź Voivodeship, 95-100, > Poland" > > I have not tried 3.4.2 which you mentioned in the issue tracker. > > There must be something unusual with your installation. What guide did > you follow to set up the database? What OS, Postgresql and Postgis version > do you run? What are your special settings in settings/local.php? > > Sarah >
_______________________________________________ Geocoding mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/geocoding
