Direct air capture of CO2 with chemicals: optimization of a two-loop
hydroxide carbonate system using a countercurrent air-liquid contactor
Marco Mazzotti, Renato Baciocchi, Michael J. Desmond, Robert H. Socolow

Abstract
Direct Air Capture (DAC) of CO2 with chemicals, recently assessed in a
dedicated study by the American Physical Society (APS), is further
investigated with the aim of optimizing the design of the front-end
section of its benchmark two-loop hydroxide-carbonate system. Two new
correlations are developed that relate mass transfer and pressure drop
to the air and liquid flow velocities in the countercurrent packed
absorption column. These relationships enable an optimization to be
performed over the parameters of the air contactor, specifically the
velocities of air and liquid sorbent and the fraction of CO2 captured.
Three structured Sulzer packings are considered: Mellapak-250Y,
Mellapak-500Y, and Mellapak-CC. These differ in cost and pressure drop
per unit length; Mellapak-CC is new and specifically designed for CO2
capture. Scaling laws are developed to estimate the costs of the
alternative DAC systems relative to the APS benchmark, for plants
capturing 1 Mt of CO2 per year from ambient air at 500 ppm CO2
concentration. The optimized avoided cost hardly differs across the
three packing materials, ranging from $518/tCO2 for M-CC to $568/tCO2
for M-250Y. The $610/tCO2 avoided cost for the APS-DAC design used
M-250 Y but was not optimized; thus, optimization with the same
packing lowered the avoided cost of the APS system by 7 % and improved
packing lowered the avoided cost by a further 9 % The overall
optimization exercise confirms that capture from air with the APS
benchmark system or systems with comparable avoided costs is not a
competitive mitigation strategy as long as the energy system contains
high-carbon power, since implementation of Carbon Capture and Storage,
substitution with low-carbon power and end-use efficiency will offer
lower avoided-cost strategies.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to