Hi All

If something turned out to be a great way to extend bio-diversity, increase food supplies and save lives should we sue people for not doing it?

Stephen

Emeritus Professor of Engineering Design School of Engineering University of Edinburgh Mayfield Road Edinburgh EH9 3JL Scotland s.sal...@ed.ac.uk Tel +44 (0)131 650 5704 Cell 07795 203 195 WWW.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs

On 06/12/2013 02:09, Mike MacCracken wrote:
Re: [geo] Implications of Current Developments in International Liability for the Practice of Marine Geo-engineering Activities Interesting how seemingly confident the author is of potentially adverse impacts of iron fertilization. How would the harm be identified and proven? There are ways to work at determining if fertilization would work, but how would the damage done be figured out in a convincing way? Lots could be asserted, but what could be proven? Sure there are differences, but does that make it harmful?

Mike




On 12/5/13 7:50 PM, "Andrew Lockley" <andrew.lock...@gmail.com> wrote:

    
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9083401

    Implications of Current Developments in International Liability
    for the Practice of Marine Geo-engineering Activities

    Jung-Eun KIM *

    Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Republic of Korea
    ocean...@kiost.ac

    Abstract

    Ocean fertilization was first introduced as a carbon dioxide
    mitigation technique in the 1980s. However, its effectiveness to
    slow down climate change is uncertain and it is expected to damage
    the marine environment. Consequently, international law, including
    the London Convention/Protocol and the Convention on Biological
    Diversity, limits this activity to scientific research purposes.
    The applicability and scope of existing treaties for regulating
    this activity have been reviewed within international legal
    systems, in particular within the London Protocol. The
    establishment of a liability regime with respect to these
    activities has also been raised during a discussion on regulation
    of ocean fertilization under the London Protocol. One of the key
    purposes of the liability regime could be to make ocean users more
    cautious when exploring and exploiting the oceans through charging
    cleaning costs or imposing compensation for damage. This paper
    aims to identify such a preventative effect of the international
    liability regime, in particular, state liability.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to