It is not true that ocean fertilisation experiments require international 
approval. 

Under the London Convention and London Protocol all such applications for 
permits are dealt with by the relevant country or countries involved. This 
would usually be the coastal state if the experiment were to be carried out 
within its EEZ or the flag state of the vessel when carried out on the High 
Seas. There is also a provision for the state where the material is loaded 
onto a vessel to permit such activities. The countries party to the London 
Convention and London Protocol are responsible for implementing the 
requirements of those international treaties. There is no requirement for 
international approval. 

The London Convention and London Protocol Parties have developed an Ocean 
Fertilisation Assessment Framework and that does encourage consultation 
with relevant stakeholders. In addition, when the amendment to the London 
Protocol adopted in October 2013 comes into force – it requires 
ratification by 2/3rds of the Contracting Parties to the Protocol to come 
into force – the permitting Contracting Party is required to establish a 
consultation process with all relevant stakeholders nationally or 
internationally when a proposal is submitted. While the amendment states 
that "Consent should be sought from all countries with jurisdiction or 
interests in the region of potential impact without prejudice to 
international law", it is not required.

Chris.


On Tuesday, July 1, 2014 6:25:46 PM UTC+1, andrewjlockley wrote:

>
> http://aeon.co/magazine/nature-and-cosmos/can-tiny-plankton-help-reverse-climate-change/
>
> Extract 
>
> But Smetacek’s research cruise already demonstrated that iron 
> fertilisation works, and the science behind it has been vetted and 
> published in the journal Nature, as recently as 2012. Despite this 
> progress, there have been no scientific research cruises since 2009, and 
> there are none planned for the future. At the very moment it revealed its 
> promise, the white whale of iron fertilisation seems to have slipped under 
> the waves anew.
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to