Dear Colleagues,

 

The Union of Concerned Scientists is pleased to share our official position 
on solar geoengineering, now posted online at the following link and pasted 
below: 
https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2019/gw-position-Solar-Geoengineering-022019.pdf

 

---

Shuchi Talati, Ph.D.

Geoengineering Research Governance and Public Engagement Fellow

Union of Concerned Scientists 

(202) 331-6955

[email protected]

 

 

 

*UCS Position on Solar Geoengineering*

*February 2019*

 

*Deep cuts in emissions of heat-trapping gases and investments in 
adaptation to now unavoidable impacts must remain humanity’s first-line 
responses to climate change. Emission reductions and adaptation must be 
carried out at a greatly accelerated pace, and in a manner consistent with 
sustainable development 
<https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf> and 
efforts to eradicate poverty.*

 

*Limiting global temperature increase to the Paris Agreement’s target 
<https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf> *of “*well 
below 2°C above preindustrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the 
temperature increase to 1.5°C” **requires that the US and other nations 
bring net global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to zero by no later than 
mid-century, alongside deep cuts in emissions of other heat-trapping gases. 
*

 

*Avoiding catastrophic climate change through accelerated mitigation and 
adaptation alone may be feasible, but it is by no means certain. The world 
faces severe climate risks <https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/> even at 1.5°C. *

 

*The history of scientific understanding of climate change is one in which 
we have consistently confronted climate impacts and risks more swiftly and 
at lower increases in temperature than previously anticipated 
<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959378012001215>. 
We must be prepared for the prospect that such trends will continue 
<https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07586-5>.*

 

*A precautionary approach to grave climate risks is one in which society 
invests in developing a careful understanding of all possible climate 
response options, including ones that themselves pose substantial risks and 
uncertainties.** This includes developing a careful understanding of the 
possible future use of solar geoengineering technologies to rapidly cool 
the Earth by reflecting sunlight back into space. *

 

*Toward that end:*

 

   1. *The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) strongly opposes any 
   deployment of solar geoengineering because solar geoengineering 
   technologies pose significant environmental, ethical and geopolitical 
   risks, challenges and uncertainties. * 
   2. *Further, UCS believes that society must consider the potential 
   escalation of solar geoengineering research and possible future deployment 
   with great care and with substantial leadership from nations and 
   communities most vulnerable to climate change.* 
   3. *UCS encourages computer modeling and monitoring of the climatic 
   impacts of natural events such as volcanic eruptions to improve 
   understanding of the potential efficacy and risks of solar geoengineering. * 
   4. *UCS strongly opposes stratospheric tests 
   <https://www.pnas.org/content/116/4/1089> of solar geoengineering 
   technologies that would be of sufficiently large scale to have a measurable 
   impact on Earth’s surface climate. * 
   5. *UCS believes that smaller-scale outdoor experiments should only go 
   forward if legitimate independent governance mechanisms are established to 
   ensure that proposed experiments have high scientific quality and value and 
   that they pose negligible environmental, social and legal risks.  Such 
   governance mechanisms 
   <https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsta.2016.0459>** 
   must **be transparent and inclusive, ensuring meaningful engagement with 
   climate vulnerable communities and other civil society stakeholders, and 
   provide oversight over the duration of the experiments.* 
   6. *UCS calls on the scientific community to support independent 
   governance of proposed outdoor experiments; accept funding for solar 
   geoengineering experiments only from governments and other entities who 
   unequivocally support mitigation and adaptation as the first-line solutions 
   to climate change; and co-develop solar geoengineering research priorities 
   in collaboration with researchers and stakeholders in climate vulnerable 
   nations and communities 
   <https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsta.2016.0459>.* 

 

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to