Indeed, there could be some parallels. But at least one significant difference: there is currently no obvious intergovernmental organization for SRM equivalent to what the WHO does for health. Consequently, where would such a decision pop-up, either to guide research ex ante or to regulate ex post? A serious gap in governance frameworks.
Janos ======================= Janos Pasztor Executive Director Carnegie Climate Geoengineering Governance Initiative (C2G2) 2 rue du Temple, CH-1180 Rolle, Switzerland Mobile: +41-79-739-5503 jpasz...@c2g2.net | www.c2g2.net Twitter: @jpasztor | Skype: jpasztor From: <geoengineering@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Andrew Lockley <andrew.lock...@gmail.com> Reply-To: "andrew.lock...@gmail.com" <andrew.lock...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 19 February 2019 at 13:38 To: geoengineering <geoengineering@googlegroups.com> Subject: [geo] WHO forms human genome editing panel in wake of controversy - BioNews Poster's note: obvious parallel to SRM regulation backlash. I expect our field to replicate this experiment-backlash-regulate model. https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_141446 WHO forms human genome editing panel in wake of controversy<https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_141446> 18 February 2019 By Sam Sherratt<https://www.bionews.org.uk/samsherratt> Appeared in BioNews 987<https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_141432> The World Health Organization (WHO) is convening<https://www.who.int/ethics/topics/human-genome-editing/committee-members/en/>an 18-member committee of scientific experts from around the globe next month with the goal of developing international standards for the oversight of human genome editing<https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_2517>. According to the WHO's official announcement<https://www.who.int/ethics/topics/human-genome-editing/committee-members/en/>made last week, the committee will 'examine the scientific, ethical, social and legal challenges associated with human genome editing'. The committee plans to have its first meeting in Geneva in March with the aim of reviewing the current landscape of genetic research. The committee will be overseen by co-chairs<https://www.who.int/ethics/topics/human-genome-editing/committee-members/en/index1.html> Justice Edwin Cameron, a prominent human rights lawyer and justice of South Africa's Constitutional Court, and Dr Margaret Hamburg, foreign secretary of the US National Academy of Medicine. The committee membership itself comprises of an international coalition of medical doctors, biomedical researchers, human rights lawyers and bioethicists, including Professor Robin Lovell-Badge<https://www.progress.org.uk/robinlovellbadge>, chair of trustees of Progress Educational Trust, which publishes BioNews. The WHO's decision is thought to be motivated largely by a recent controversy in China, where Chinese researcher Dr He Jiankui stunned the global scientific community with his announcement that he had used CRISPR/Cas9<https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_2519> genome editing technology to create the world's first genetically modified human children. Dr He revealed the birth of the twin girls last year ahead of a major genome editing conference in Hong Kong, describing how he and his colleagues had used CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in human embryos<https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_2310> to remove a gene<https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_2316> called CCR5, with the aim of producing 'HIV-resistant infants' (see BioNews 977<https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_140038>). Dr He's announcement was met with widespread outrage by many who considered the experiments poorly performed and unethical. Additional developments have only added to the furore, as it has also been announced<http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-01/21/c_137762633.htm> by Chinese media outlets that Dr He may have committed further ethical breaches, including the forging of ethical review documents. The WHO hopes to reduce the chance of such incidents occurring in the future with the formation of the new committee, with the aim to 'advise and make recommendations on appropriate governance mechanisms for human genome editing'. SOURCES & REFERENCES Hamburg to co-chair WHO human genome editing committee<https://www.biocentury.com/bc-extra/politics-policy/2019-02-14/hamburg-co-chair-who-human-genome-editing-committee> Biocentury | 15 February 2019 WHO appoints expert panel on gene editing after world's first baby claim<https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/gene-editing-who-1.5019421> CBC | 14 February 2019 WHO expert advisory committee on Developing global standards for governance and oversight of Human Genome editing<https://www.who.int/ethics/topics/human-genome-editing/committee-members/en/> World Health Organisation | 14 February 2019 World Health Organization Forms Committee To Guide Editing Of Human Genes<https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/02/14/694710663/will%20examine%20the%20scientific,%20ethical,%20social%20and%20legal%20challenges%20associated%20with%20human%20genome%20editing.%20The%20aim%20will%20be%20to%20advise%20and%20make%20recommendations%20on%20appropriate%20governance%20mechanisms%20for%20human%20genome%20editing> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com<mailto:geoengineering@googlegroups.com>. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.