https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/japp.12643
*Author* Britta Clark <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/doSearch?ContribAuthorRaw=Clark%2C+Britta> *First published: 06 January 2023* https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12643 *ABSTRACT* *Should high-income countries engage in solar geoengineering research and possible deployment*? On the assumption that the speed of the energy transition will be insufficient to abate catastrophic climate impacts, research into solar geoengineering begins to look like a technically and socially feasible route to mitigate such impacts. But on the assumption that a rapid and relatively just energy transition is still within the realm of political possibility, research into solar geoengineering looks more like an ideological tool designed to divert time and resources from less risky climate solutions. At the heart of debates over solar geoengineering, then, is disagreement over what political actors can be expected to do in the future. In this article, I argue that both objectors to and proponents of solar geoengineering research often make background assumptions regarding expected future actions that are either (a) inaccurate or (b) inconsistent. I propose an account of expected future actions that avoids these problems and sketch what the debate over solar geoengineering looks like with these assumptions in place. *Citation*: Clark, B. (2023). How to Argue about Solar Geoengineering. *Journal of Applied Philosophy*. *Source: Wiley Online Library* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAOyeF5s_bw0OjJcbq9ba_yHr7n0SmAp1yZy1uWxigb8gcf8GGQ%40mail.gmail.com.
