Sean Gillies wrote:
On May 13, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
strk wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:19:23AM -0400, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Only, it'll have to stay (I've read Mateusz suggesting using
type-specific destroyers).
I cannot imagine why a type specific destroyer would be needed
for simple malloc()/free() buffer allocations.
Frank,
But GEOS user does not know what allocator is hidden behind
GEOSGeomToWKT function and he does *not* need or want to know.
GEOSFree exposes all the meat that is supposed be encapsulated
and it makes GEOS C API not symmetric so confusing.
Aren't we supposed to be using the reader/writer API now? Add
GEOSWK*Writer_Free functions (if we must) to those interfaces and
GEOSFree to address the problem with deprecated GeomToWKT?
Sean / Mateusz,
It is my personal opinion that since these buffers are just allocated
from the heap with malloc(), exposing a GEOS specific free - and making
it clear when it is suitable to use is a more than adequate solution.
If you guys feel strongly enough about type specific, or reader/writer
interface specific deallocators for these buffers then I'd suggest you
bring it to a motion to replace/override my implementation and I'll
then adapt GDAL appropriately.
I'm in a bad mood, and less receptive than normal to esoteric conceptual
correctness wanking.
Regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent
_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel