Sean Gillies wrote:

On May 13, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:

Frank Warmerdam wrote:
strk wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:19:23AM -0400, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Only, it'll have to stay (I've read Mateusz suggesting using
type-specific destroyers).
I cannot imagine why a type specific destroyer would be needed
for simple malloc()/free() buffer allocations.

Frank,

But GEOS user does not know what allocator is hidden behind GEOSGeomToWKT function and he does *not* need or want to know.

GEOSFree exposes all the meat that is supposed be encapsulated
and it makes GEOS C API not symmetric so confusing.

Aren't we supposed to be using the reader/writer API now? Add GEOSWK*Writer_Free functions (if we must) to those interfaces and GEOSFree to address the problem with deprecated GeomToWKT?

Sean / Mateusz,

It is my personal opinion that since these buffers are just allocated
from the heap with malloc(), exposing a GEOS specific free - and making
it clear when it is suitable to use is a more than adequate solution.

If you guys feel strongly enough about type specific, or reader/writer
interface specific deallocators for these buffers then I'd suggest you
bring it to a motion to replace/override my implementation and I'll
then adapt GDAL appropriately.

I'm in a bad mood, and less receptive than normal to esoteric conceptual
correctness wanking.

Regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent

_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

Reply via email to