On Sep 20, 2011, at 8:35 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 08:26:12AM -0500, Howard Butler wrote: >> On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > >>> I'd have to create a "geos" organization and re-import the data >>> with proper author identification and all branches, but I'm kind >>> of lazy on that. Not a big deal as long as we have the SVN side of >>> things... >> >> Having the GEOS organization be the owner of the master git tree on >> github and moving entirely to github for source control for the GEOS >> project would be perfectly fine with me :) > > With no SVN backup, you mean ? > No more trac->changeset reference (r### won't be enough) ? > It's a pity to loose that kind of support. > I'd be happier with an OSGEO solution. > > Anyway, if you are willing to spend some time on it, a GEOS organization > and a better imported history (with proper authorship and branches ?) would > be worth a try.
OpenLayers is working on getting git+Trac working on the OSGeo instance. We could do that too when things become available, and I do not have a strong opinion either way. github's pull requests are a killer feature though. Howard _______________________________________________ geos-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
