Yes it is reasonable ... I'll try to keep the branch and trunk aligned as
much as possible also.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alessio Fabiani ha scritto:
>
>> My idea is not to use the same model, the WCS 1.0.0 and WCS 1.1.x schemas
>> are too different ... my idea is to make the two different models live into
>> different packages but merge the dispatcher/transformer as much as possible
>> in GeoServer.
>>
>> Btw I have to do now an important question ... is it acceptable a so
>> radical refactoring of the WCS module in GS 1.7.x or it should/must be done
>> in GS trunk?
>>
>
> I would be much more confident if you could do it on trunk or in
> a branch (so that you can commit stuff as you go),
> test it so that it passes the WCS 1.0 and 1.1 tests (maybe with
> some ND data, that WCS cite is able to check), and then merge back
> to 1.7.x once it's solid.
>
> How does this sound?
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Eng. Alessio Fabiani
Vice-President /CTO GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob: +39 349 8227000
http://www.geo-solutions.it
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
