> Ouch, merge them? Last time I checked the xml schemas of the two specs > where so different that a single module trying to address them seemed > very hard to achieve. Do you have a plan on how to deal with that? > > Don't get me wrong, having a single wcs module able to handle > both wcs 1.0 and wcs 1.1 would be very good, I'm just wondering > how this can be achieved in practice.
Does merge here mean merge together... or merge into GeoServer? If the former I think I agree with Andrea here after looking at the schemas. They are pretty radically different. When we did wfs 1.1 we used the same model for both wfs 1.1 and 1.0 and there were issues... i think doing the same with wcs might be pretty hard. -Justin > > Cheers > Andrea > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > !DSPAM:4007,48635f72299595219720167! > -- Justin Deoliveira The Open Planning Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
