> If possible I would like to add a user interface requirement to > extensions; I understand that this sets a high bar for an extension but > I think it is important that extensions be "product ready" to the same > level we expect of geoserver modules. I disagree here. A UI is nice and often needed but there often cases where a UI is unnecessary, like data store extensions where we do fancy introspection to create the UI. With the new configuration and a java bean only philosophy for config objects i see this being more popular.
It also limits the scope of extensions imho. It limits them to things we want to manage with the user interface... Like for instance it might make sense for a certain extension to be configured via a rest interface, or some other tool for that matter. My 2c. -Justin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
