Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Anyways, yes I see your point, there is always a case for a UI. I > agree with that. Its just I don't think it should be a blocker. I > mean.. .if it is we can say bye bye to bundling geowebcache with > GeoServer... since it has no UI. Interesting; GeoWebCache must have some kind of configuration? - A directory it writes files into? - Tile size? - does it have some log settings we can change - does it have anything?
Let me try for a real small minimum; can we have a page showing the currently loaded "extensions" and if they have been loaded correctly? I would like to visually communicate what is going on to the user; for community modules it is not a big deal - but for an extension I want something to change somewhere at least acknowledging the existence of the extension. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
