Andrea Aime wrote: > Gabriel Roldan ha scritto: >> Hi Rini, >> >> you're right, it should be true that if the layer is disabled it >> should not show up on getcaps. If it's not it's a bug ans as Andrea >> pointed out one quite possibly left there as the result of the >> resource/publish split not yet being finished. > > Oh boy. The bug is in this broken understanding that layer and resources > are somewhat decoupled in the current trunk. They are not, this has been > states a number of times already. > > Workspaces and namespaces are one. > Layer and resources are one. A layer cannot be disabled without > disabling the resource as well, if this is allowed, then this is the > bug, not otherwise. > Repeat with me: there is no resource/publish split in act. > > The current situation is transitional, to avoid making too many changes > in one go and be stuck for 6 months recovering from the changes. > > I hope this clarifies things a little Disregard you think I don't yet understand that. I should have said the split not existing yet, my fault. My point was helping Rini take a direction where she doesn't need to depend on a collateral effect of a higher level entity (geoserver) to get her lower level one (the DataAccess) to find the related resources it needs.
Cheers, Gabriel > Cheers > Andrea > > -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
